Челябинский метеороид: критика источников и обоснование выводов
Инженерный журнал: наука и инновации
# 7·2016 37
Chelyabinsk meteoroid: review of sources
and substantiation of conclusions
© Yu. I. Lobanovsky
Irkut Corporation Joint-Stock Company, Moscow, 125315, Russia
The study shows that the idea of an aerial explosion of a chondritic meteoroid with the
density of 3300 kg/m
3
, diameter of about 15…20 m, mass of 10…15 kt and explosion en-
ergy of 0,3…0,5 Mt TNT, which took place on Feb 15th, 2013, in the sky to the south-
south-west of Chelyabinsk, is completely out of agreement with the phenomena actually
observed at the moment in the atmosphere and on the underlying terrain. This is proven
by infrasound investigation results, excess shockwave pressure levels in Chelyabinsk and
its surroundings, and data on broken glass, demolished gates and deformed bearing
beams of steel. The mass of the Chelyabinsk meteoroid trail also supports this. The study
analyses available data and explains the reasons why there appeared incorrect yet widely
published estimations of meteoroid parameters and explosion characteristics.
Keywords:
Chelyabinsk meteoroid, meteoroid, nuclear blast, infrasound, flash, shock
wave, pressure.
REFERENCES
[1]
Lobanovsky Yu.I.
Parameters of Chelyabinsk and Tunguska Objects and their
Explosion Modes.
Available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.1967[2]
Lobanovsky Yu.I.
Refined Parameters of Chelyabinsk and Tunguska Meteoroids
and their Explosion Modes.
Available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.7282[3]
Lobanovsky Yu.I.
Inzhenernyy zhurnal: nauka i innovatsii — Engineering
Journal: Science and Innovation
, 2016, no. 6. Available at:
dx.doi.org/10.18698/2308-6033-2016-06-1503[4]
Marcus R., Melosh H.J., Collins G.
Earth Impact Effects Program. Imperial
College
(London),
Purdue
University,
2010
.
Available
at:
http://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEffects/[5]
Brown P.G., Assink J. D., Astiz L. et al.
Nature
, vol. 503, no. 7475, 2013,
pp. 238–241. Available at:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v503/n7475/full/nature12741.html[6]
Popova O.P., Jenniskens P., Emeliyanenko V. et al.
Science
, vol. 342, no. 6162,
2013, pp. 1069–1073. Available at:
https://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6162/1069[7]
Russia Meteor Not Linked to Asteroid Flyby. JPL, Caltech, Latest News,
February 15, 2013
. Available at:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2013-061[8]
Cooke W.
Why wasn't the Russian Meteor detected before it entered the
Atmosphere? NASA News, Watch the Skies, February 20, 2013
. Available at:
https://blogs.nasa.gov/Watch_the_Skies/2013/02/19/post_1361308690869/[9]
Allen K.
Chelyabinsk fireball: Canadian scientists still sizing it up.
Thestar.com,
World, April 12, 2013
. Available at:
http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2013/04/12/chelyabinsk_fireball_canadian_scientists_still_sizing_it_up.html
[10]
Dobrovidova O.
Iz Chelyabinska s lyubovyu: kak v Amerike obsuzhdali meteorit.
RIA-Novosti, Nauka, April 15, 2013
[From Chelyabinsk with Love: How the
Meteorite was Discussed in America. RIA News, Science, Apr. 15th, 2013].
Available at:
http://ria.ru/science/20130415/932637522.html[11]
IMS Infrasound Network. DTRA Verification Database
. Available at:
http://www.rdss.info/infrastat/network/map.html