Previous Page  37 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

Челябинский метеороид: критика источников и обоснование выводов

Инженерный журнал: наука и инновации

# 7·2016 37

Chelyabinsk meteoroid: review of sources

and substantiation of conclusions

© Yu. I. Lobanovsky

Irkut Corporation Joint-Stock Company, Moscow, 125315, Russia

The study shows that the idea of an aerial explosion of a chondritic meteoroid with the

density of 3300 kg/m

3

, diameter of about 15…20 m, mass of 10…15 kt and explosion en-

ergy of 0,3…0,5 Mt TNT, which took place on Feb 15th, 2013, in the sky to the south-

south-west of Chelyabinsk, is completely out of agreement with the phenomena actually

observed at the moment in the atmosphere and on the underlying terrain. This is proven

by infrasound investigation results, excess shockwave pressure levels in Chelyabinsk and

its surroundings, and data on broken glass, demolished gates and deformed bearing

beams of steel. The mass of the Chelyabinsk meteoroid trail also supports this. The study

analyses available data and explains the reasons why there appeared incorrect yet widely

published estimations of meteoroid parameters and explosion characteristics.

Keywords:

Chelyabinsk meteoroid, meteoroid, nuclear blast, infrasound, flash, shock

wave, pressure.

REFERENCES

[1]

Lobanovsky Yu.I.

Parameters of Chelyabinsk and Tunguska Objects and their

Explosion Modes.

Available at:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.1967

[2]

Lobanovsky Yu.I.

Refined Parameters of Chelyabinsk and Tunguska Meteoroids

and their Explosion Modes.

Available at:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.7282

[3]

Lobanovsky Yu.I.

Inzhenernyy zhurnal: nauka i innovatsii — Engineering

Journal: Science and Innovation

, 2016, no. 6. Available at:

dx.doi.org/10.18698/2308-6033-2016-06-1503

[4]

Marcus R., Melosh H.J., Collins G.

Earth Impact Effects Program. Imperial

College

(London),

Purdue

University,

2010

.

Available

at:

http://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEffects/

[5]

Brown P.G., Assink J. D., Astiz L. et al.

Nature

, vol. 503, no. 7475, 2013,

pp. 238–241. Available at:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v503/n7475/full/nature12741.html

[6]

Popova O.P., Jenniskens P., Emeliyanenko V. et al.

Science

, vol. 342, no. 6162,

2013, pp. 1069–1073. Available at:

https://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6162/1069

[7]

Russia Meteor Not Linked to Asteroid Flyby. JPL, Caltech, Latest News,

February 15, 2013

. Available at:

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2013-061

[8]

Cooke W.

Why wasn't the Russian Meteor detected before it entered the

Atmosphere? NASA News, Watch the Skies, February 20, 2013

. Available at:

https://blogs.nasa.gov/Watch_the_Skies/2013/02/19/post_1361308690869/

[9]

Allen K.

Chelyabinsk fireball: Canadian scientists still sizing it up.

Thestar.com

,

World, April 12, 2013

. Available at:

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2013/04/12/chelyabinsk_fireball_canadian_

scientists_still_sizing_it_up.html

[10]

Dobrovidova O.

Iz Chelyabinska s lyubovyu: kak v Amerike obsuzhdali meteorit.

RIA-Novosti, Nauka, April 15, 2013

[From Chelyabinsk with Love: How the

Meteorite was Discussed in America. RIA News, Science, Apr. 15th, 2013].

Available at:

http://ria.ru/science/20130415/932637522.html

[11]

IMS Infrasound Network. DTRA Verification Database

. Available at:

http://www.rdss.info/infrastat/network/map.html