Certain conclusions on results of introducing the reliability design and technological analysis in rocket and space production. Part 2
Authors: Pokhabov Yu.P.
Published in issue: #9(141)/2023
DOI: 10.18698/2308-6033-2023-9-2304
Category: Aviation and Rocket-Space Engineering | Chapter: Design, construction and production of aircraft
The paper generalizes results of introducing procedures of reliability design and technological analysis (RDTA) in the one-time actuation mechanisms of the spacecraft rotary structures (hereinafter referred to as the mechanisms). It provides principles of the mechanisms design and examples of establishing the design documentation requirements in their design process. The differences between processes of the mechanism design and construction are presented, and examples of design and technological factors that could lead to potential failures of such mechanisms are given. Principles of substantiating the spacecraft onboard equipment performance and reliability are considered. Commonality and differences in substantiating performance and reliability of mechanisms and of other onboard equipment of spacecraft are provided. As a result of the RDTA introduction, it was revealed that methods were missing in substantiating performance and reliability of the products for various purposes that were different in form. Only the content of engineering tasks that ensured fulfillment of their service purpose was varying. Moreover, solutions to such problems could be verified using the formalized procedures in reliability design and technological analysis.
References
[1] Pokhabov Yu.P. Konstruktorsko-tekhnologicheskiy analiz nadezhnosti [Reliability design and technological analysis]. Krasnoyarsk, SFU Publ., 2022. Available at: https://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/145578?show=full&ysclid=la7xc81kmz225201519 (accessed February 20, 2023).
[2] Pokhabov Yu.P. Teoriya i praktika obespecheniya nadyezhnosti mekhanicheskikh ustroystv odnorazovogo srabatyvaniya [Theory and practice of ensuring the need for mechanical devices of one-time operation]. Krasnoyarsk, SFU Publ., 2018, 338 p.
[3] Pokhabov Yu.P. Proektirovanie vysokootvetstvennykh sistem s uchetom nadezhnosti na primere povorotnoy shtangi [Design for reliability highly responsible systems on the example of a moving rod]. Zhurnal SFU. Tekhnika tekhnologii — Journal of Siberian Federal University. Engineering & Technologies, 2019, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 861–883.
[4] Timashev S.A., Pokhabov Yu.P. Problemy kompleksnogo analiza i otsenki individualnoy konstruktsionnoy nadezhnosti kosmicheskikh apparatov (na primere povorotnykh konstruktsiy) [Integrated analysis and assessment problems of individual structural reliability of spacecraft (case of deployable structures]. Ekaterinburg, AMB Publ., 2018, 38 p.
[5] Timashev S.A. Methodology of assessing individual reliability of unique structures. Russian Journal of Construction Science and Technology, 2019, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5–19.
[6] Pokhabov Yu.P., Ushakov I.A. O bezavariynosti funktsionirovaniya unikalnykh vysokootvetstvennykh sistem [On trouble-free functioning of the unique highly responsible systems]. Metody menedzhmenta kachestva — Quality management methods, 2014, no. 11, pp. 50–56.
[7] Kruglov G.E. Analiticheskoe proektirovanie mekhanicheskikh sistem [Analytical design of mechanical systems]. Samara, SGAU Publ., 2001, 132 p.
[8] Zimin V.N., Borzykh S.V. Mekhanika transformiruemykh krupnogabaritnykh kosmicheskikh konstruktsiy. Ch. 1: Solnechnye batarei kosmicheskikh apparatov [Mechanics of transformable large-sized space structures. Part 1: Spacecraft solar batteries]. Moscow, BMSTU Publ., 2012, 67 p.
[9] Gorovtsov V.V., Zhiryakov A.V., Telepnev P.P., et al. Issledovanie dinamiki resheniya i zadachi proektirovaniya transformiruemykh konstruktsiy posadochnogo modulia KA “Ekzomars” [Dynamic analysis and design approach to transformable structures of the “Exomars” landing module]. Vestnik NPO imeni S.A. Lavochkina — Bulletin of Lavochkin Association, 2016, no. 4, pp. 75–80.
[10] Venikov G.V. Proektirovanie i nadezhnost [Design and reliability]. Moscow, Znanie Publ., 1971, 96 p.
[11] Zolotov A.A., Pokhabov Yu.P., Gusev E.V. Obespechenie proektnoy nadezhnosti raskryvayuschikhsya konstruktsiy kosmicheskikh apparatov [Ensuring design reliability of the deployable spacecraft structures properties]. Obscherossiyskiy nauchno-tekhnicheskiy zhurnal “Polet” — All-Russian Scientific-Technical Journal “Polyot” (“Flight”), 2018, no. 7, pp. 36–45.
[12] Pokhabov Yu.P., Shendalev D.O., Kolobov A.Yu., et al. K voprosu ustanovleniya koeffitsientov bezopasnosti i zapasov prochnosti pri zadannoy veroyatnosti nerazrusheniya silovykh konstruktsiy [To the question of establishing safety coefficient and assurance coefficient at a given probability of non-destruction of load-bearing structures]. Sibirskiy aerokosmicheskoy zhurnal — The Siberian Aerospace Journal, 2021, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 166–176.
[13] Kuznetsov A.A. Nadezhnost konstruktsii ballisticheskikh raket [Reliability of the ballistic missile design]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1978, 256 p.
[14] Kuznetsov A.A., Zolotov A.A., Komyagin V.A., et al. Nadezhnost mekhanicheskikh chastey konstruktsii letatelnykh apparatov [Reliability of mechanical parts of the aircraft structures]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1979, 144 p.
[15] Testoedov N.A., Mikhnev M.M., Mikheev A.E., et al. Tekhnologiya proizvodstva kosmicheskikh apparatov [Spacecraft production technology]. Krasnoyarsk, SibGAU Publ., 2009, 349 p.