Engineering Journal: Science and InnovationELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PUBLICATION
Certificate of Registration Media number Эл #ФС77-53688 of 17 April 2013. ISSN 2308-6033. DOI 10.18698/2308-6033
  • Русский
  • Английский
Article

Numerical modeling of a honeycomb head for a regenerator used in microcryogenic gas systems

Published: 23.05.2017

Authors: Kulik V.V., Navasardyan E.S., Parkin A.N.

Published in issue: #8(68)/2017

DOI: 10.18698/2308-6033-2017-8-1646

Category: Power, Metallurgic and Chemical Engineering | Chapter: Machines and Devices, Processes of Refrigeration and Cryogenic Engineering, Air Conditioning

We employed numerical analysis methods to assess time between failures for microcryogenic gas systems at the design stage, taking into account various factors, including structural parameters. We suggest using multi-factor heat, gas and fluid dynamics analysis, based on integration of accumulated experience in experimental investigations and numerical modelling. We provide an example of applying this multi-factor heat, gas and heat dynamics analysis to analysing units of microcryogenic gas systems. We conducted three-dimensional numerical modelling of structure and fluid dynamics in a honeycomb regenerator as the primary risk-accumulating unit. We compared the results of numerically investigating the drag in the regenerator we modelled as a function of the Reynolds number to the results of computations based on foreign researchers’ correlation dependences, which showed a high degree of convergence with Tanaka’s and Blase’s dependencies. This comparison forms the basis for using the model supplied in the mathematical model for further computations.


References
[1] Arkharov I.A., Navasardyan E.S., Simakov M.V. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 2016, vol. 51, no. 11, 12, pp. 765-770.
[2] Nagimov R.R., Arkharov I.A., Navasardyan E.S. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 2016, vol. 52, issue 7, pp. 1-5.
[3] Aleksandrov A.A., Arkharov I.A., Navasardyan E.S., Antonov E.A. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 2016, vol. 51, issue 9, pp. 649-655.
[4] Pelevin F.V. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Mashinostroenie - Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Маchine Building, 2016, no. 2 (671), pp. 42-52.
[5] Nam K., Jeong S. Cryogenics, 2005, vol. 45, pp. 368-379.
[6] Trevizoli P., Liu Y., Tura A., Rowe A., Barbosa J. Experimental thermal and fluid science, 2014, vol. 57, pp. 324-334.
[7] Zeygarnik Yu.A., Ivanov F.P. Teplofizika vysokikh temperatur - High Temperature, 2010, no. 48 (3), pp. 402-408.
[8] Kulik V.V., Parkin A.N., Navasardyan E.S. Khimicheskoe i neftegazovoe mashinostroenie - Chemical and petroleum engineering, 2016, no. 8, pp. 14-19.
[9] Chmielewski M., Gieras M. Computational methods in science and technology, 2013, no. 19 (2), pp. 107-114. DOI: 10.12921/cmst.2013.19.02.107-114
[10] ANSYS Fluent User’s Guide. ANSYS, Inc. Release 15.0. Southpointe, 2013.
[11] Thomas B., Pittman D. Update on the evaluation of different correlations for the flow friction factor and heat transfer of Stirling engine regenerators. 35th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit (IECEC), 2000, pp. 76-84.