Engineering Journal: Science and InnovationELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PUBLICATION
Certificate of Registration Media number Эл #ФС77-53688 of 17 April 2013. ISSN 2308-6033. DOI 10.18698/2308-6033
  • Русский
  • Английский
Article

Methodology for Computation and Experimental Evaluation of Deformation Parameters of Rubber Strikers

Published: 11.02.2026

Authors: Levin D.P., Petukov A.V., Kudryavskiy A.E.

Published in issue: #2(170)/2026

DOI:

Category: Mechanics | Chapter: Mechanics of Deformable Solid Body

The paper considers the problem of determining the equilibrium “engineering stress–engineering strain” curves for elastomers under dynamic loading during impact with a rigid wall. To construct this curve, the deformation parameters of kinetic elements are necessary to be determined taking into account their hardness and velocity under dynamic loading. However, no methodology currently exists for evaluating these parameters. Based on more than 80 experiments involving firing a non-deformable wall with a rubber kinetic element, a method has been proposed for the computational and experimental assessment of the deformation parameters of rubber strikers of varying hardness in the speed range from 10 to 120 m/s, characteristic of the striking elements of special non-lethal kinetic weapons. After verifying the numerical method for solution convergence, the interaction process between the rubber striker and the non-deformable wall was simulated using a simplified rubber model. Equilibrium “engineering stress–engineering strain” curves were determined based on experimentally obtained parameters for 55A and 80A Shore‑hardness projectiles using both mesh‑based and mesh‑free methods for subsequent use in Finite Element Modeling of impact interactions with anthropomorphic dummy models.

EDN BYEVDX


References
[1] Levin D.P., Lyushnin S.A. Baza dannykh «oruzhiye neletalnogo deystviya» kak instrument prognozirovaniya riskov razvitiya OND-tekhnologiy [Database of “non lethal weapons” as a tool for predicting risks of NLD technologies]. Inzhenerny zhurnal: nauka i innovatsii — Engineering Journal: Science and Innovation, 2015, iss. 3 (39), p. 1. DOI: 10.18698/2308-6033-2015-3-1378 Available at: https://engjournal.bmstu.ru/catalog/arse/itae/1378.html
[2] Levin D.P., Lyushnin S.A. Realizatsiya bazy dannykh “Oruzhiye neletalnogo deystviya” [Implementation of the “non lethal weapons” database]. Inzhenernyy vestnik, 2013, no. 10, p. 11.
[3] Levin D.P., Selivanov V.V. Metodicheskiy podkhod k otsenke deystviya kine-ticheskikh elementov po mnogokomponentnoy tseli [Methodological approach for evaluating kinetic ellements effects on multi component targets]. Voprosy oboronnoy tekhniki. Seriya 16: Tekhnicheskiye sredstva protivodeystviya terrorizmu — Military Enginery. Scientific and Technical Journal. Issue 16: Counter-terrorism technical devices, 2019, no. 5 6 (131 132), pp. 17–24.
[4] Bir C.A., Viano D.C. Design and Injury Assessment Criteria for Blunt Ballistic Impacts. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 2004, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1218–1224.
[5] Bir C.A. The evaluation of blunt ballistic impacts of the thorax: PhD Thesis. Detroit, Michigan, Wayne State University, 2000, 215 p.
[6] Mertz H., Prasad P., Irwin A. Injury risk curves for children and adults in front and rear collisions. Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper Series, 1997, paper no. 973318, pp. 1–15.
[7] Gao D., Wampler C.W. Head injury criterion. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2009, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2009.934824
[8] Oukara A., Robbe C., Nsiampa N., Papy A. Assessment of non-lethal projectile head impacts. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials, 2016, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41314-016-0001-2
[9] Roth S., Torres F., Feuerstein P., Thoral-Pierre K. Anthropometric dependence of the response of a thorax FE model under high speed loading: validation and real world accident replication. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2013, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.11.004
[10] Bodo M., Bracq A., Delille R., Marechal C., Roth S. Thorax injury criteria assessment through non-lethal impact using an enhanced biomechanical model. International Journal of Computational Methods, 2017, vol. 14, no. 4, paper 1740027. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519417400279
[11] Bracq A., Delille R., Bourel B., Marechal C., Haugou G., Lauro F., Roth S., Mauzac O. Numerical recreation of field cases on a biofidelic human FE model involving deformable less-lethal projectiles. Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety, 2019, vol. 3, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41314-019-0022-8
[12] Bouamal A., Levesque H. Development and validation of a finite element human thorax model under blunt ballistic trauma. Internal report. Valcartier, Canada, 2007, 45 p.
[13] Stitzel J.D., Gayzik F.S., Hoth J.J., Mercier J., Gage D.H., Morton K.A., Duma S.M., Payne R.M. Development of a finite element-based injury metric for pulmonary contusion. Part I: model development and validation. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 2005, vol. 49, pp. 1–32.
[14] Denisov A.V., Stepanov M.D., Kharaldin N.A., Stepanov A.V., Borovkov A.I., Zhukov I.E., Kurinnoy E.D., Tsurikov S.G. Primenenie matematicheskoy modeli torsa cheloveka dlya modelirovaniya zabronevogo vozdeystviya v ranevoy balistike [Application of a human torso mathematical model for simulating behind-armor effects in wound ballistics]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Voyenno-meditsinskoy akademii — Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy, 2020, no. 3 (71), pp. 132–139.
[15] Denisov A.V., Saykov N.T., Zhukov I.E., Agafonov P.V. Analiz sovremennykh otechestvennykh metodik opredeleniya urovnya zabronyevogo vozdeystviya pri neprobitii bronyezheleta [Analysis of modern Russian methods for determining the level of behind-armor effects when a bulletproof vest is not penetrated]. Voprosy oboronnoy tekhniki. Seriya 16: Tekhnicheskiye sredstva protivodeystviya terrorizmu — Military Enginery. Scientific and Technical Journal. Issue 16: Counter-terrorism technical devices, 2021, no. 9–10 (159–160), pp. 36–46.
[16] Beklemyshyeva K.A., Vasyukov A.V., Petrov I.B. Chislennoe modelirovanie dinamicheskikh protsessov v biomekhanike setochno-kharakteristicheskim metodom [Numerical simulation of dynamic processes in biomechanics by a mesh-characteristic method]. Zhurnal vychislitel’noy matematiki i matematicheskoy fiziki — Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 2015, vol. 55, no. 8, p. 1380.
[17] Levin D.P., Petyukov A.V., Arcivenko M.E., Astua A.V.G. Modeling of the kinetic element interaction with biological object. Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety, 2022, vol. 6, art. no. 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41314-022-00042-3
[18] Ouyang D., Qin C., Qin X., Zhang Q., Liu X. Numerical study on the blocking effect of skin on Flash-Ball impact and damage assessment. Defence Technology, 2023, vol. 19, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2023.05.005
[19] Mooney M. A theory of large elastic deformation. Journal of Applied Physics, 1940, vol. 11, pp. 582–592.
[20] Rivlin R.S. Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials. IV. Further developments of the general theory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1948, vol. 241, no. 835, pp. 379–397.
[21] Paviera J., Langlet A., Eches N., Jacquet J.-F. On ballistic parameters of less lethal projectiles influencing the severity of thoracic blunt impacts. Injury, 2013, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1160–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.004
[22] Sahoo D., Robbe C., Deck C., Meyer F., Papy A., Willinger R. Head injury assessment of non-lethal projectile impacts: a combined experimental/computational method. Injury, 2016, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1952–1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.004
[23] Taylor G.I. The use of flat-ended projectiles for determining dynamic yield stress. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1948, vol. 194, no. 1038, pp. 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0081
[24] Kolling S., Du Bois P.A., Benson D.J., Feng W.W. A tabulated formulation of hyperelasticity with rate effects and damage. Computational Mechanics, 2007, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 885–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-006-0150-x