Engineering Journal: Science and InnovationELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PUBLICATION
Certificate of Registration Media number Эл #ФС77-53688 of 17 April 2013. ISSN 2308-6033. DOI 10.18698/2308-6033
  • Русский
  • Английский
Article

Method of determining the elastic properties degradation level in the heavy gage composite panels exposed to the low-velocity impact action

Published: 01.08.2024

Authors: Molkov O.R., Bolshikh A.A.

Published in issue: #8(152)/2024

DOI: 10.18698/2308-6033-2024-8-2379

Category: Aviation and Rocket-Space Engineering | Chapter: Design, construction and production of aircraft

The paper proposes a method to compute the elastic properties degradation level in composite panels exposed to the low-velocity impact action. The method makes it possible to reduce the panel defects to a linear statement based on the impact energy and thickness of the panel under study. The study was conducted to determine an elastic properties degradation level in the heavy gage composite panels exposed to the low-velocity impact action leading to defects of the 1st category. To present the developed method, a series of numerical simulations of the orthotropic composite panels of different thicknesses was carried out based on the experimental standard for the ASTM D7136 hardness drop testing to simulate impact damage in a composite panel. The presented method is a combination of both numerical analysis and empirical approach in identifying the elastic properties degradation level in the heavy gage composite panels exposed to the low-velocity impact loads, as well as in calculating the empirical coefficient. The paper determines that this method could be introduced in preliminarily assessment of residual strength and critical force in the stability loss for the composite panels at early stages of the aircraft design without complex and resource-intensive computation. During testing, the proposed method demonstrated good convergence between the obtained numerical results and the experimental data. The paper notes acceptable qualitative similarity of the destruction simulated mechanism and form with those observed in the experiments.

 EDN LJDGYS


References
[1] Pogosyan M., Nazarov E., Bolshikh A., Koroliskii V., Turbin N., Shramko K. Aircraft composite structures integrated approach: a review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, vol. 1925, p. 012005. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1925/1/012005
[2] Feigenbaum Y.M., Dubinsky S.V., Bozhevalov D.G., Sokolov Yu.S., Metelkin E.S., Mikolaichuk Yu.A., Shapkin V.S. Obespechenie prochnosti aviatsionnykh konstruktsiy s uchetom sluchaynykh udarnykh vozdeystviy [Ensuring the strength of composite aircraft structures, taking into account accidental operational impacts]. Moscow, Tekhnosfera Publ., 2018.
[3] Abrate S. Impact on Composite Structures. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[4] Abrate S. Damage in laminates from low-velocity impacts. In: Dynamic Deformation, Damage and Fracture in Composite Materials and Structures. Woodhead Publishing, 2016, pp. 35–69. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100080-9.00003-8
[5] Aviatsionnye pravila AP-25. Normy letnoy godnosti samoletov transportnoy kategorii [Aviation Regulations AP-25. Airworthiness standards: transport category aircraft]. Moscow, 2009.
[6] Olsson R., Robin. F. Analytical prediction of large mass impact damage in composite laminates. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2001, vol. 32, iss. 9, pp. 1207–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00073-2
[7] Lin S., Solver I., Thorsson M., Waas A.M. Predicting the low velocity impact damage of a quasi-isotropic laminate using EST. Composite Structures, 2020, vol. 251, p. 112530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112530
[8] Lin S., Waas A.M. Experimental and high-fidelity computational investigations on the low velocity impact damage of laminated composite materials. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, 2020. DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-0724
[9] Kassapoglou C. Modeling the effect of damage in composite structures: simplified approaches. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
[10] Abrate S. Modeling of impacts on composite structures. Composite Structures, 2001, vol. 51 (2), pp. 129–138. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00138-0
[11] A.S. ASTM D7136. A standard method for determining the damage of a composite material with a polymer matrix, reinforced with fiber, as part of a falling load impact test. 2015, p. 39.
[12] Falcó O., Ávila R.L., Tijs B., Lopes C.S. Modelling and simulation methodology for unidirectional composite laminates in a virtual test lab framework. Composite Structures, 2018, vol. 190, pp. 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.016
[13] Abaqus 2021 User Guide.
[14] Tan W., Falzon B., Chiu L., Price M. Predicting low velocity impact damage and Compression-After-Impact (CAI) behaviour of composite laminates. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2015, vol. 71, pp. 212–226. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.025
[15] Pham D., Lua J., Sun H., Zhang D. A three-dimensional progressive damage model for drop-weight impact and compression after impact. Journal of Composite Materials, 2019, vol. 54 (4), pp. 449–462. DOI: 10.1177/0021998319859050
[16] Chen F., Yao W., Jiang W. Experimental and simulation investigation on BVID and CAI behaviors of CFRP laminates manufactured by RTM technology. Engineering Computations, 2021, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 2252–2273. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-01-2020-0008
[17] Abir M., Tay E., Ridha M., Lee P. On the relationship between failure mechanism and compression after impact (CAI) strength in composites. Composite Structures, 2017, vol. 182, pp. 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.038
[18] Rivallant S., Bouvet C., Hongkarnjanakul N. Failure analysis of CFRP laminates subjected to compression after impact: FE simulation using discrete interface elements. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2013, vol. 55, pp. 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.08.003
[19] Sun C., Hallett R. Failure mechanisms and damage evolution of laminated composites under compression after impact (CAI): Experimental and numerical study. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2018, vol. 104, pp. 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.026
[20] Shao R., Liu N., Zheng J. Numerical comparison between Hashin and Chang-Chang failure criteria in terms of inter-laminar damage behavior of laminated composite. Materials Research Express 8.8, 2021, no. 085602. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ac1d40
[21] Chi-Seung Lee, Jeong-Hyeon Kim, Seul-kee Kim, Dong-Man Ryu, Jae-Myung Lee. Initial and progressive failure analyses for composite laminates using Puck failure criterion and damage-coupled finite element method. Composite Structures, 2015, vol. 121, pp. 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.011
[22] Wang J., Pineda E., Ranatunga V., Smeltzer S.S. 3D progressive damage modeling for laminated composite based on crack band theory and continuum damage mechanics. In: American Society for Composites. 30th Technical Conference, East Lansing, MI, 2015, no. 20682.
[23] Lopes S., Seresta O., Coquet Y., Gürdal Z., Camanho P., Thuis B. Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part I: Experiments. Composites Science and Technology, 2009, vol. 69 (7–8), pp. 926–936. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.009
[24] Lopes S., Camanho P., Gürdal Z., Maimí P., González V. Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part II: Numerical simulations. Composites Science and Technology, 2009, vol. 69 (7–8), pp. 937–947. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.015