Analysis of ways to improve the efficiency of various purpose spacecraft control through the flight control unification and integration
Authors: Matyushin M.M., Kutomanov A.Yu., Ivanov A.A., Kotelya V.V.
Published in issue: #11(119)/2021
DOI: 10.18698/2308-6033-2021-11-2130
Category: Aviation and Rocket-Space Engineering | Chapter: Aircraft Dynamics, Ballistics, Motion Control
The article considers the problem of analyzing the possibility of increasing the control efficiency of spacecrafts and orbital groupings operating in different orbits, having a different composition of the ground control loop technical means and, as a consequence, different technological control cycles. The main purpose of the study is to substantiate the possibility of increasing the efficiency of control of the constantly expanding orbital grouping of the State Corporation “Roscosmos” through the rational use of MCC software and hardware (active means) in terms of their unification, the use of common computing resources to ensure the functioning of MCCs by various purposes spacecrafts with the ability of their operational redistribution in the flight control process. Examples of the implementation of the above approaches in the currently being created product “Roscosmos basic MCC” are given. The results of the analysis of the possibilities of using the Roskosmos basic MCC in existing and prospective projects are presented.
References
[1] Matyushin M.M., Kutomanov A.Yu., Usikov S.B., Gordienko V.A., Grudin D.V., Panenko V.S. Kosmonavtika i raketostroenie — Cosmonautics and Rocket Engineering, 2020, no. 5 (11), pp. 64–78.
[2] Utkin V.F., Kryuchkov Yu.V. Nadezhnost i effektivnost v tekhnike. Spravochnik: V 10 tomakh. T. 3. Effektivnost tekhnicheskikh system [Reliability and efficiency in technology. Handbook: In 10 vols, vol. 3. Efficiency of technical systems]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie Publ., 1988, 328 p.
[3] Petukhov G.B., Yakunin V.I. Metodologicheskie osnovy vneshnego proyektirovaniya tselenapravlennykh protsessov i tseleustremlennykh sistem [Methodological foundations of external design of purposeful processes and purposeful systems]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2006, 504 p.
[4] Nedayvoda A.K., Rozhdestvensky A.V. Trudy MAI — Transactions of Moscow Aviation Institute, 2012, no. 56. Available at: http://trudymai.ru/upload/iblock/2a5/otsenka-effektivnosti-i-kachestva-raketno_kosmicheskoy-tekhniki.pdf?lang=ru&issue=56
[5] Solovyev V.A., Lysenko L.N., Lyubinsky V.E. Upravlenie kosmicheskimi poletami [Space flight control]. Moscow, BMSTU Publ., 2009, part 1, 476 p.
[6] Matyushin M.M., Kutomanov A.Yu. Tsentr upravleniya poletami kak klyuchevoy element tekhnologii upravleniya kosmicheskim dvizheniyem [Mission Control Center as a key element of space traffic control technology]. Sistemnyy analiz, upravleniye i navigatsiya. Tezisy dokladov XXIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii “Sistemnyy analiz, upravleniye i navigatsiya” Yevpatoriya, 01–08 iyulya 2018 goda [System analysis, control and navigation. Abstracts of the XXIII international scientific conference “System analysis, control and navigation”, Evpatoria, July 01–08, 2018]. Moscow, MAI Publ., 2018, pp. 21–24.
[7] Matyushin M.M., Kutomanov A.Yu. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2021, vol. 2318, art. ID 110007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0036174
[8] Pochukaev V.N. Osnovnye kontseptualnye polozheniya ballistiko-navigatsionnogo obespecheniya poletov avtomaticheskikh kosmicheskikh apparatov [The main conceptual provisions of ballistic and navigation support for automated spacecraft flights]. Moscow, Mashinostroenie — Polet Publ., 2018, 156 p.
[9] Malyshev V.V., ed. Sputnikovyye sistemy monitoringa. Analiz, sintez i upravleniye. Razdel 3.5 [Satellite monitoring systems. Analysis, synthesis and management. Section 3.5]. Moscow, MAI Publ., 2000, 566 p.
[10] Vinogradov D.Yu., Davydov E.A. Inzhenernyy zhurnal: nauka i innovatsii — Engineering Journal: Science and Innovation, 2017, iss. 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.18698/2308-6033-2017-6-1630